R263-1 Purpose: This rule establishes a procedure whereby a student enrolled in a public institution of higher education may petition the Board of Regents to review a policy that directly affects the student’s enumerated civil liberties, which the student believes the institution adopted without first establishing an administrative rule governing the enumerated civil liberty.
R263-3 Review Process
3.1 Students enrolled at a public institution of higher education who believe the institution has adopted a policy that directly impacts one of their enumerated civil liberties but which is not governed by an existing administrative rule may petition the Board of Regents for a review.
3.2 To file a petition for review, a student will send a written request that identifies the policy for which a review is requested to firstname.lastname@example.org. Within 30 days of receiving the complaint, the Commissioner of Higher Education’s office, on behalf of the Board of Regents, will:
3.2.1 Review the petition to determine if it is made in good faith;
126.96.36.199 Bad faith petitions shall be dismissed.
3.2.2 Determine if the institution has established an administrative rule that adopts or governs the policy; and
3.2.3 If the institution lacks a governing administrative rule, direct the institution to initiate rulemaking within 60 days of the decision.
Adopted September 13, 2019